Maturity according to Jean Piaget

Along with growth and learning, maturation is one of the three processes that play an essential part in a someone’s development. It does not necessarily happen along with aging or physical growth.

Several authors attempted to explain this maturation process through many diverse and different theories.

Piaget, for example, observed and described the behavior of children at different ages. His theory, being very broad, explains many concepts, such as language or moral development, from birth to adolescence.

But, what do we exactly mean when referring to the term maturation or maturity?                    It can be defined as “the development of the self”. For Piaget, it is kind of the same thing as intelligence, and the ways in which we construct it and use it in order to answer in an appropriate manner to the environment – a.k.a. genetic epistemology.

Piaget proposed that all human beings are born with very basic mental structures, and so we must pass through a series of biological stages, building on one upon the other, in order to reach this maturation. He attempted to explain this in his theory of cognitive development, about the nature and development of human intelligence.

For him, maturation reports the interaction between genetics and socio-environmental influences. The child takes the information he has learned from the different experiences and uses it to build fragments or schemas of thought that will determine how he sees the world and how he interprets future interactions or experiences.

Also, maturation is no longer seen as being limited to childhood. Instead, we are always evolving in this sense (although Piaget only focused his studies on children).

For Piaget, simply growing up already played a crucial role in children’s capacity to understand the world, stating that children cannot assume certain tasks until they are psychologically mature enough.

While in this process of growing up, children go through a series of stages: sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational and formal operational.

These four stages are universal, and change along with maturation, as they are biologically based. As in every process, there are always individual differences. From the sensorimotor to the preoperational stages, the kid evolves from building a schema of a certain object until they are able to think about something symbolically. Next stage is a turning point in the child’s development, in which the beginning of logical thought is marked. Finally, the formal operational stage, life-lasting period, in which we develop the ability to think abstractly.

Basically, Jean Piaget recognized that children play an important part in their own development and maturation process, and this is why some children are not capable of certain thought practices, because they haven’t yet reached a high enough level of maturity.

Personally, I think Piaget was right when stating that both genetic and environmental factors, when interacting, build on what is a child’s maturation – this is why we all evolve in different manners and not always at the same time or level; another reason for saying that we are always in this process of becoming mature.

Furthermore, I also think he was one of the most important authors when coming to the formation of one’s personality related to maturation, and this is why we should take him into account when studying this topic.

Works cited

Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic Epistemology. New York: Norton.

Piaget, J. (1977). Gruber, H.E.; Voneche, J.J. eds. The essential Piaget. New York: Basic Books.

Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s theory. In P. Mussen (ed). Handbook of Child Psychology. 4th edition. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.

2 Comments

  1. Cris, I really enjoyed this post. I think that Piaget is for sure a very influential author when it comes to describing maturity, and agree with the idea that maturity is something that is developed with time rather than something that suddenly appears from one day to the next. However, the one aspect of his theory that I am quite skeptical about is the fact that after a certain point (the formal operational stage), he makes no further distinction regarding levels of maturity. I guess I disagree with this aspect of his theory because I think that there is a big difference between the maturity of a 15 year old who may have reached this mature stage according to Piaget and the maturity of a 35-40 year old person, who apart from having reached this stage is probably more mature in other ways. For example, aspects of maturity like independence and emotional intelligence, which maybe aren’t really accounted for in this theory. Overall though, i think Piaget’s stages are a valuable point of view to consider when looking at maturity which is an very complex topic.

    Like

  2. Hello Adri, thank you for your comment!
    I agree with you in what you are stating. Honestly, I also think Piaget was wrong in no making any further distinctions after the formal operational stage.
    In fact, many other authors also disagreed with him in this and other aspect of his theories, as it happened with Vygotsky or H. Gardner.
    The first author developed his theories at around the same time as Jean Piaget did. However, these differ in many ways, such as in placing more importance on cultural and social context as the manner of shaping cognitive development.
    Gardner also challenged the cognitive development work of Piaget. He showed evidence that at any point in life a child may be at very different stages. For example, in number development and spatial-visual maturation, he successfully threaten the idea that knowledge at any particular developmental stage hangs together in a structured whole.

    Anyway, Piaget is a very important author and we should always take into account his theory of cognitive development when referring to maturity.

    Like

Leave a comment